Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: correct Markdown header syntax #2

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Anon-im
Copy link

@Anon-im Anon-im commented Dec 6, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Corrected typographical errors for improved clarity in the README file.
    • Updated the section header from "Developement" to "Development."
    • Maintained existing instructions for repository setup, package installation, and running the application.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes primarily involve the README.md file, where typographical errors have been corrected for clarity. Notably, the header "Developement" has been updated to "Development." The overall structure of the document remains unchanged, preserving instructions for repository cloning, package installation, database setup, environment variable configuration, and application execution in both development and production modes. The API documentation section, including a link to the UI, has also been maintained without modifications.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Corrected "Developement" to "Development"; preserved overall structure and content.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant System
    User->>System: Clone repository
    User->>System: Install packages
    User->>System: Set up database
    User->>System: Configure environment variables
    User->>System: Run application (dev/production)
    System-->>User: Application running
Loading

🐇 "In the README, changes are clear,
Typo fixed, now have no fear.
Development shines, instructions stay,
Hop along, let’s code away!
With clarity, we’ll build and play!" 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ebef237 and 1fe1145.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
README.md

38-38: Expected: h2; Actual: h3
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time

(MD001, heading-increment)

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Simple-indexer requires PostgreSQL as a backend database and [TypeORM](https://g

# How to run

### Developement
### Development
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix heading hierarchy in the README

The current heading structure is inconsistent. The document jumps from h1 ("How to run") directly to h3 ("Development"), skipping the h2 level. This violates Markdown heading hierarchy best practices.

Apply this diff to fix the heading structure:

-### Development
+## Development

Additionally, consider applying the same change to other h3 headings under main sections for consistency:

  • Under "Project setup": Change 1-4 to h2
  • Under "How to run": Change "Production" to h2

This would create a more logical and consistent document structure:

# Main Section (h1)
## Sub Section (h2)
### Sub-sub Section (h3)
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)

38-38: Expected: h2; Actual: h3
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time

(MD001, heading-increment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant